University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives
Rural Cooperatives, March/April 2000, pp. 25-26 Published by the Rural Business and Cooperative Development Service
How Does Your Local Farm Supply Cooperative Rate? By Beverly L. Rotan Economist USDA Rural Development Rural Business-Cooperative Service With farm commodity prices severely depressed and thousands of producers all across the nation struggling for their economic survival, most farmers could improve their odds by belonging to financially strong marketing and supply cooperatives to add some certainty to an uncertain world. But a cooperative is not a panacea, and managers and directors need to constantly monitor all aspects of the cooperative operation to make certain it is returning a good value to its members. One way to measure the success of your farm supply cooperative is to compare it with the performance of cooperatives with similar functions during the past year. Was its performance higher, lower or about the same as the average of a cross section of local farm cooperatives with similar factors? The two tables below contain average financial data compiled from a survey of 329 cooperatives for 1997 and 1998. These include trend and industry norm comparisons. Fill in the blanks and compare these benchmarks with your cooperative's financial data. So how is your cooperative doing? | Table 1 - Compare your farm supply cooperative 1/ with averages for cooperatives with similar functions |
| Size(1997) 2, 3/ |
| Size (1998) 2,3/ | Your cooperative | | Measure/Item | Item | Small | Medium | Large | Super |
| Small | Medium | Large | Super | | Sell farm supplies only | Percent | 85 | 60 | 41 | 10 |
| 85 | 60 | 41 | 10 |
| | Total assets | Mil. dol. | 1.6 | 4.1 | 7.4 | 14.0 |
| 1.6 | 4.3 | 7.9 | 15.4 |
| | Long-term debt | Thou. dol. | 90.0 | 342.0 | 661.2 | 786.3 |
| 88.1 | 361.7 | 759.4 | 1,284.4 |
| | Total liabilities | Thou. dol. | 404.6 | 1,287.0 | 2,646.5 | 5,544.1 |
| 405.6 | 1,324.3 | 2,937.2 | 6,055.9 |
| | Total sales | Mil. dol. | 2.9 | 7.2 | 13.3 | 24.9 |
| 2.6 | 7.0 | 12.7 | 26.0 |
| | Total service revenue | Thou. dol. | 48.1 | 204.1 | 320.1 | 665.9 |
| 56.2 | 201.7 | 321.7 | 686.5 |
| | Total revenue | Mil. dol. | 2.9 | 7.7 | 14.1 | 26.5 |
| 2.7 | 7.2 | 13.5 | 27.6 |
| | Net income (losses) | Thou. dol. | 115.4 | 335.5 | 642.2 | 1,159.2 |
| 85.7 | 300.3 | 506.8 | 1,049.4 |
| | Total of labour expenses | Percent | 54 | 51 | 53 | 54 |
| 54 | 51 | 53 | 55 |
| | Patronage refunds received | Thou. dol. | 67.1 | 184.9 | 319.5 | 761.6 |
| 70.5 | 184.2 | 333.3 | 790.2 |
| | Liquidity ratios |
| | Current | Ratio | 2.39 | 1.90 | 1.51 | 1.42 |
| 2.35 | 1.90 | 1.40 | 1.41 |
| | Quick | Ratio | 1.42 | 1.05 | 0.80 | 0.71 |
| 1.38 | 1.05 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| | Leverage ratios |
| | Debt to asset | Ratio | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| | Debt to equity | Ratio | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| | Times interest earned | Ratio | 7.37 | 7.47 | 6.27 | 7.30 |
| 5.87 | 6.83 | 5.37 | 5.88 |
| | Profitability ratios |
| | Gross profit margin | Percent | 16.99 | 16.64 | 18.65 | 16.12 |
| 17.86 | 18.15 | 19.56 | 15.88 |
| | Return on total assets before interest and taxes | Percent | 9.12 | 10.01 | 10.97 | 10.57 |
| 6.81 | 8.86 | 8.30 | 8.85 |
| | Return on total equity | Percent | 10.05 | 11.87 | 13.49 | 13.68 |
| 7.20 | 10.21 | 10.13 | 11.22 |
| 1/100 percent of sales were generated from farm supply sales. 2/Small = Sales are $5 million or less; medium = $5 million to $10 million; large = $10 million to $20 million; and super = over $20 million. 3/There were 329 cooperatives surveyed in both years. | | Table 2 - Compare your mixed farm supply cooperative 1/ with averages for cooperatives with similar functions |
| Size(1997) 2, 3/ |
| Size (1998) 2,3/ | Your cooperative | | Measure/Item | Item | Small | Medium | Large | Super |
| Small | Medium | Large | Super | | Market farm products and sell farm supplies | Percent | 6 | 19 | 24 | 19 |
| 6 | 19 | 24 | 19 |
| | Total assets | Mil. dol. | 1.1 | 3.7 | 8.3 | 16.2 |
| 1.1 | 3.9 | 8.6 | 17.4 |
| | Long-term debt | Thou. dol. | 27.9 | 479.4 | 1,063.2 | 2,029.7 |
| 116.0 | 571.2 | 1,117.8 | 2,094.0 |
| | Total liabilities | Thou. dol. | 399.1 | 1,380.0 | 3,293.8 | 8,099.2 |
| 342.8 | 1,467.2 | 3,381.7 | 8,594.6 |
| | Total sales | Mil. dol. | 2.7 | 7.9 | 14.6 | 34.9 |
| 2.5 | 7.3 | 14.4 | 34.3 |
| | Total service revenue | Thou. dol. | 60.6 | 251.3 | 550.1 | 1,102.9 |
| 65.6 | 293.8 | 598.5 | 1,224.7 |
| | Total revenue | Mil. dol. | 2.9 | 8.4 | 15.6 | 36.9 |
| 2.6 | 7.8 | 15.5 | 36.4 |
| | Net income (losses) | Thou. dol. | 14.3 | 232.8 | 377.2 | 868.3 |
| 34.2 | 233.0 | 388.1 | 941.9 |
| | Total of labour expenses | Percent | 51 | 48 | 51 | 48 |
| 51 | 49 | 51 | 49 |
| | Patronage refunds received | Thou. dol. | 27.9 | 125.8 | 345.6 | 634.9 |
| 31.8 | 126.6 | 365.2 | 662.6 |
| | Liquidity ratios |
| | Current | Ratio | 1.54 | 1.74 | 1.44 | 1.36 |
| 2.33 | 1.70 | 1.30 | 1.32 |
| | Quick | Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 0.81 | 0.64 |
| 1.18 | 0.94 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
| | Leverage ratios |
| | Debt to asset | Ratio | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.25 |
| 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.25 |
| | Debt to equity | Ratio | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.25 |
| 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| | Times interest earned | Ratio | 1.70 | 4.47 | 3.61 | 3.20 |
| 2.53 | 4.68 | 3.37 | 3.32 |
| | Activity ratios |
| | Fixed asset turnover | Ratio | 11.83 | 7.39 | 5.80 | 7.98 |
| 10.29 | 5.72 | 5.06 | 7.19 |
| | Total asset turnover | Ratio | 2.49 | 2.17 | 1.76 | 2.15 |
| 2.31 | 1.87 | 1.66 | 1.97 |
| | Profitability ratios |
| | Gross profit margin | Percent | 11.17 | 12.37 | 14.51 | 13.45 |
| 12.47 | 13.31 | 15.58 | 15.10 |
| | Return on total assets before interest and taxes | Percent | 4.00 | 8.96 | 6.82 | 8.35 |
| 5.83 | 8.03 | 6.75 | 8.36 |
| | Return on total equity | Percent | 2.03 | 10.25 | 7.49 | 10.70 |
| 4.73 | 9.66 | 7.37 | 10.64 |
| 1/50 to 99 percent of sales were generated from farm supply sales. 2/Small = Sales are $5 million or less; medium = $5 million to $10 million; large = $10 million to $20 million; and super = over $20 million. 3/There were 329 cooperatives surveyed in both years. |
|